tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3839131113481621095.post1267481879350406979..comments2023-06-16T07:01:52.541-07:00Comments on The Blog of Dr. T. Michael W. Halcomb: Mark’s Answer to the Ransom Question: Studies in Mark, Pt. 66TMWHhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/06807155020816222182noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3839131113481621095.post-34317917141095594712008-06-19T17:42:00.000-07:002008-06-19T17:42:00.000-07:00Doug,The way you put the first answer here certain...Doug,<br>The way you put the first answer here certainly makes your previous statements seem clearer. Also, I don't think, and I never suggested, that you accepted that I was correct on everything. You stated that in our discussion. What you said I was correct on was the way that ransom was portrayed in Mk. 14. After I pointed out that it was at play in ch. 10 instead of 14, you agreed (you said "thanks for picking me up on it"). That's all I was saying you agreed with me on. Thus, just so the "reader" knows, no, Doug doesn't agree with me on everything. Thanks for the interaction and thought-provoking, though, Doug!T. Michael W. Halcombhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/01119080394574322124noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3839131113481621095.post-76805968466166738892008-06-19T15:50:00.000-07:002008-06-19T15:50:00.000-07:00Michael, as I've said in the comments on my ow...Michael, as I've said in the comments on my own post, you misunderstand me (though I can see that I expressed myself in a way that encouraged the misunderstanding). What I should have made more clear is that I was saying 'Jesus interpreted the woman's action as a recognition of his impending death, which he understood to be a ransom for many".<br>I also think you misunderstand me if you think I accepted you were correct in general, rather than on one specific point of misunderstanding. But let the reader make up their own mind!Doug Chaplinhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/10326403777027937887noreply@blogger.com